If JM Uses Two Hands, He Will Spend Two Terms – Owusu Bempah Prophecy Sparks Controversy
A recent prophecy by renowned Ghanaian preacher, Prophet Isaac Owusu Bempah, has ignited a wave of debate and concern ahead of President-elect John Dramani Mahama’s upcoming swearing-in ceremony on January 7, 2025. Speaking during a church service, Owusu Bempah revealed that he had received a divine message regarding Mahama’s potential term limits.
According to the preacher, Mahama should hold the state sword with both hands to secure two terms in office. If he were to hold it with only one hand, Owusu Bempah suggested, Mahama would serve just a single term.
According to Ghanaweb, the statement quickly raised eyebrows among Ghanaians, with many questioning its implications. Critics of the prophecy have expressed concern that it could be interpreted as an attempt to influence constitutional changes.
Ghana’s 1992 Constitution clearly restricts presidents to two terms, and Mahama, having previously served from 2013 to 2017, is already nearing the end of his second term in 2028.
Some citizens have voiced their alarm over the potential for unrest. One individual questioned whether Owusu Bempah was subtly encouraging Mahama to pursue a third term, warning that such actions could lead to political instability or even a coup.
Others dismissed the prophecy as a distraction from more pressing national concerns. A political analyst pointed out that at a time when Ghana faces significant economic challenges, such statements could divert attention from critical issues like governance and recovery.
This controversy brings to light the ongoing tension between religious influence and the political process in Ghana. While Owusu Bempah’s followers view his pronouncements as spiritual guidance, his critics fear that such prophecies could undermine the country’s democratic framework and create unnecessary division.
As the country prepares for Mahama’s inauguration, many are calling for a focus on maintaining constitutional integrity and ensuring that religion does not unduly influence political decisions. The debate serves as a reminder of the importance of public education on the separation of church and state in Ghana’s democratic governance.